« zpět na výpis měsíce |

[Talk-cz] DIBAVOD Import - which license?

Vlákno 14.4. - 16.4.2012, počet zpráv: 4


14.4.2012 09:00:09 (#1)
gravatar

malenki

<osm_ at malenki.ch>
5
Hi, because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import today. Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was donated. It would be kind to add a regarding line here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue Best regards Thomas (malenki)

15.4.2012 10:39:38 (#2)
gravatar

"Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"

<xificurk at gmail.com>
169
malenki wrote: zobrazit citaci
> Hi, > > because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import > today. > Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data > seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact > declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was > donated. > > It would be kind to add a regarding line here: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue > > Best regards > Thomas > (malenki)
Hello, as far as I know the license is not clearly stated on the dibavod webpage. Our czech wiki page with free datasources [1] states that it's free (as cost) and without any license restrictions - personally confirmed by the head of GIS department. I'm not sure who exactly checked this, but we could probably dig this up in the talk-cz archive. I'll add this item to the catalogue. Best regards, Petr Mor?vek aka Xificurk [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap#Vodstvo_.28DIBAVOD.29 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xificurk.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 211 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20120415/c5d092d8/attachment.vcf> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20120415/c5d092d8/attachment.pgp>

15.4.2012 11:51:42 (#3)
gravatar

Martin Kokeš

<shr3k at typo3-hosting.com>
135
Hi all, AFAIK DIVABOD is by Czech law (Copyright Act & Water Act) a official or authoritative work (Amtswerk auf Deutsch) and thus it's not in favour with any kind of copyright protection, besides of EU-citizen public free access right to all hydrography informations embodied in INSPIRE directive. MK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Petr Mor?vek [Xificurk]" [mailto:xificurk at gmail.com] To: osm_ at malenki.ch Cc: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic [mailto:talk-cz at openstreetmap.org] Sent: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:39:38 +0200 Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] DIBAVOD Import - which license? zobrazit citaci
> malenki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import > > today. > > Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data > > seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact > > declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was > > donated. > > > > It would be kind to add a regarding line here: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue > > > > Best regards > > Thomas > > (malenki) > > Hello, > > as far as I know the license is not clearly stated on the dibavod > webpage. Our czech wiki page with free datasources [1] states that it's > free (as cost) and without any license restrictions - personally > confirmed by the head of GIS department. I'm not sure who exactly > checked this, but we could probably dig this up in the talk-cz archive. > > I'll add this item to the catalogue. > > Best regards, > Petr Mor?vek aka Xificurk > > [1] > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap#Vodstvo_.28DIBAVOD.29 >

16.4.2012 03:53:01 (#4)
gravatar

malenki

<osm_ at malenki.ch>
5
Martin Koke? wrote: zobrazit citaci
> AFAIK DIVABOD is by Czech law (Copyright Act & Water Act) a official > or authoritative work (Amtswerk auf Deutsch) and thus it's not in > favour with any kind of copyright protection, besides of EU-citizen > public free access right to all hydrography informations embodied in > INSPIRE directive.
You are right. I quite lagged behind with the state of my informations. Today I was pointed to this Meeting Minutes of the License working Group (LWG) which mentions the licenses of Pavel's imports: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=169dS6q7FYKjlUxm2vy7CmzIJH9iR7ikHIx2zMDei5uI Additionally I was told that Pavel had contact to members of the LWG on April 2nd to give permission to use his data as far as it is compatible with the ODbL (that is the biggest part of his contributions). For this he is being thanked here in #2: https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1ntJ5zd2oq_EgpFxZCeJPGbCxz1oeeEu4YSmeOmyrSuE Thanks for your attention. :) Thomas

« zpět na výpis měsíce