[Talk-cz] DIBAVOD Import - which license?
Vlákno 14.4. - 16.4.2012, počet zpráv: 4
Hi,
because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import
today.
Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data
seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact
declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was
donated.
It would be kind to add a regarding line here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
Best regards
Thomas
(malenki)
malenki wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> Hi,
>
> because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import
> today.
> Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data
> seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact
> declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was
> donated.
>
> It would be kind to add a regarding line here:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
> (malenki)
Hello,
as far as I know the license is not clearly stated on the dibavod
webpage. Our czech wiki page with free datasources [1] states that it's
free (as cost) and without any license restrictions - personally
confirmed by the head of GIS department. I'm not sure who exactly
checked this, but we could probably dig this up in the talk-cz archive.
I'll add this item to the catalogue.
Best regards,
Petr Morávek aka Xificurk
[1]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap#Vodstvo_.28DIBAVOD.29
------------- další část ---------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xificurk.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 212 bytes
Desc: [žádný popis není k dispozici]
URL: <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20120415/c5d092d8/attachment.vcf>
------------- další část ---------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20120415/c5d092d8/attachment.sig>
Hi all,
AFAIK DIVABOD is by Czech law (Copyright Act & Water Act) a official or authoritative work (Amtswerk auf Deutsch) and thus it's not in favour with any kind of copyright protection, besides of EU-citizen public free access right to all hydrography informations embodied in INSPIRE directive.
MK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]"
[mailto:xificurk na gmail.com]
To: osm_ na malenki.ch
Cc: OpenStreetMap Czech
Republic [mailto:talk-cz na openstreetmap.org]
Sent: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:39:38
+0200
Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] DIBAVOD Import - which license?
zobrazit citaci
> malenki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > because of disagreeing user Pavel I stumbled over the DIBAVOD import
> > today.
> > Although the google translation seemed to show that the DIBAVOD data
> > seems quite freely licensed it would be nice to have an exact
> > declaration under which conditions and/or which license the Data was
> > donated.
> >
> > It would be kind to add a regarding line here:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
> >
> > Best regards
> > Thomas
> > (malenki)
>
> Hello,
>
> as far as I know the license is not clearly stated on the dibavod
> webpage. Our czech wiki page with free datasources [1] states that it's
> free (as cost) and without any license restrictions - personally
> confirmed by the head of GIS department. I'm not sure who exactly
> checked this, but we could probably dig this up in the talk-cz archive.
>
> I'll add this item to the catalogue.
>
> Best regards,
> Petr Morávek aka Xificurk
>
> [1]
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap#Vodstvo_.28DIBAVOD.29
>
Martin Kokeš wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> AFAIK DIVABOD is by Czech law (Copyright Act & Water Act) a official
> or authoritative work (Amtswerk auf Deutsch) and thus it's not in
> favour with any kind of copyright protection, besides of EU-citizen
> public free access right to all hydrography informations embodied in
> INSPIRE directive.
You are right. I quite lagged behind with the state of my informations.
Today I was pointed to this Meeting Minutes of the License working
Group (LWG) which mentions the licenses of Pavel's imports:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=169dS6q7FYKjlUxm2vy7CmzIJH9iR7ikHIx2zMDei5uI
Additionally I was told that Pavel had contact to members of the LWG on
April 2nd to give permission to use his data as far as it is compatible
with the ODbL (that is the biggest part of his contributions).
For this he is being thanked here in #2:
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1ntJ5zd2oq_EgpFxZCeJPGbCxz1oeeEu4YSmeOmyrSuE
Thanks for your attention. :)
Thomas« zpět na výpis měsíce