[Talk-cz] Kaufland website import
Vlákno 1.12. - 11.12.2025, počet zpráv: 5
I want to propose importing Kaufland Websites in Czech Republic, using data on their
first-party website, via All The Places dataset.
The tricky part is that due to my mistake import mostly already happened.
I am sorry for that, that is obviously a wrong order.
See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087
You can see affected objects on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/Czech_Republic_Kaufland
If import will be rejected or not accepted, I will revert all such edits.
If import will be accepted I will post changeset comments on relevant changesets
explaining that it was in the end reviewed and accepted.
And make future edits based on new matches, once they will be found.
This is especially likely for newly opened shops.
more detail is available at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/import_Kaufland_websites_in_Czech_Republic
Please, comment if you either support this import or disagree with it.
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20251201/3f2b32dd/attachment.htm>
Hi,
I think it is well prepared and as discussed on chat also having
multiple QA checks before making any changes.
Thus I agree.
mahdi
I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.
I've manually checked 20 entities at random from the list on the wiki and I did not see any issues.
I agree with keeping the changes.
Some notes though;
- the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html
- I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool)
or script output that logs the changes being made
- You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)
- I am happy you've included a QA section
Martin
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email.
On Monday, December 1st, 2025 at 2:17 PM, Mateusz Konieczny via talk-cz <talk-cz na openstreetmap.org> wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> I want to propose importing Kaufland Websites in Czech Republic, using data on their
> first-party website, via All The Places dataset.
>
> The tricky part is that due to my mistake import mostly already happened.
> I am sorry for that, that is obviously a wrong order.
> See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087
>
> You can see affected objects on
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/Czech_Republic_Kaufland
>
> If import will be rejected or not accepted, I will revert all such edits.
>
> If import will be accepted I will post changeset comments on relevant changesets
>
> explaining that it was in the end reviewed and accepted.
> And make future edits based on new matches, once they will be found.
> This is especially likely for newly opened shops.
>
> more detail is available at
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/import_Kaufland_websites_in_Czech_Republic
>
> Please, comment if you either support this import or disagree with it.
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20251210/ac299536/attachment.htm>
Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:
zobrazit citaci
> I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.
>
Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)
zobrazit citaci
> the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - > https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html
>
which part seems to not be correct?
note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import)
rather than false positives
zobrazit citaci
> I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool)
> or script output that logs the changes being made
would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? (
locations of nodes were not changed by bot,
nodes were not created,
nodes were not added nor removed from ways,
relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)
zobrazit citaci
> You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)
>
This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)
zobrazit citaci
> I am happy you've included a QA section
>
> Martin
>
>
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20251211/8896a721/attachment-0002.htm>
Sorry, regarding the report, I misunderstood, it shows only missing, not all matched which I was expecting. I think all the numbers you§d put on a Venn diagram would be useful to show.
Yes, just plaintext. Something that could be checked or grepped without having to open up each node an a map, eg. n123456: +website:asdfg +opening_hours:12-34.
I don't know if codeberg has runners but it would be could to have the script run as "action" and output log there and automatically saved and accessible. Just an idea - don't want to push you into some workflow that may not be practical in reality.
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) secure email.
On Thursday, December 11th, 2025 at 12:03 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz na tutanota.com> wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> Dec 10, 2025, 22:18 by talk-cz na openstreetmap.org:
>
>> I've looked into the documentation, data processing code and tests, and I am satisfied with the rigor you've put into. Thank you.
>
> Thanks for replies and I am obviously happy about response being positive so far :)
>
>> - the report doesn't seem to be correct on Kaufland, so that's a bit deceiving - https://matkoniecz.codeberg.page/improving_openstreetmap_using_alltheplaces_dataset/areas/50/14_index.html
>
> which part seems to not be correct?
>
> note that my processing tries to make false negatives (avoid suggestions or import)
> rather than false positives
>
>> - I'd like to see a plaintext diff since osm.org and osmcha are not made for viewing sets of changesets. (not aware of a good tool)
>> or script output that logs the changes being made
>
> would plaintext list of tags modified would be good enough? (
> locations of nodes were not changed by bot,
> nodes were not created,
> nodes were not added nor removed from ways,
> relation roles were not modified or added or removed etc)
>
>> - You are brave in using spaces in bot's name :)
>
> This worked well, though code sits in directory path without any spaces :)
>
>> - I am happy you've included a QA section
>>
>> Martin
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20251211/6046af00/attachment.htm>« zpět na výpis měsíce