[Talk-cz] Is name=Automat na jizdenky MHD a good tagging?
Vlákno 24.5. - 25.5.2019, počet zpráv: 6
There is group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV> ) tagged
* amenity=vending_machine
* name=Automat na jizdenky MHD
* operator=DPMB
* payment:coins=yes
* vending=public_transport_tickets
Is it a good idea to use name tag in this way?
It seems to me that it is similar to name=Restaurant amenity=restaurant
and that moving this to description tag would be preferable.
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20190524/7be361a7/attachment.html>
There is a group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV> ) tagged
* amenity=vending_machine
* name=Automat na jizdenky MHD
* operator=DPMB
* payment:coins=yes
* vending=public_transport_tickets
Is it a good idea to use name tag in this way?
It seems to me that it is similar to name=Restaurant amenity=restaurant
and that moving this to description tag would be preferable.
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20190524/6929a397/attachment.html>
Dne 24. 05. 19 v 21:54 Mateusz Konieczny napsal(a):
zobrazit citaci
> There is a group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV
> ) tagged
>
> * amenity=vending_machine
> * name=Automat na jizdenky MHD
> * operator=DPMB
> * payment:coins=yes
> * vending=public_transport_tickets
>
> Is it a good idea to use name tag in this way?
Technicaly public_transport_tickets can be for any public transport.
Rails, boats, trams... so the name *can* specify this. In theory this
can be already specified by operator...
In my opinion the name does not make a harm. And taginfo say that 12.64%
of vending=public_transport_tickets use the name as well. So it is not
so uncommon.
Miroslav
Ahoj
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 23:25, Miroslav Suchý <miroslav na suchy.cz> wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> Technicaly public_transport_tickets can be for any public transport.
> Rails, boats, trams... so the name *can* specify this. In theory this
> can be already specified by operator...
>
Yes, it can be justified, when it clarifies the context (MHD is only used
for the local public transport, not a long-distance one), but it is hardly
a *name*... I agree with Mateusz, that this would serve its purpose well
enough in description.
H.
------------- další část ---------------
HTML příloha byla odstraněna...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/attachments/20190525/ce3cae5e/attachment.html>
On 24/05/2019 23:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
zobrazit citaci
> In my opinion the name does not make a harm.
I can think of a couple of reasons why not to do it:
1) The "name" is quite long and in some renderers it takes up space that
could otherwise be used for more useful names. It's even wrapped to two
lines in OsmAnd, for instance. Yes, I know, tagging for the renderer
etc., but I believe that considering the tagging is inherently wrong
(it's a description, not a name), even this should be taken into account.
2) More importantly, I believe tagging like this only fuels the notion
that seems to be pretty widespread with OSM beginners, namely that a)
anything and everything can/should have a name, and b) names and
descriptions are the same thing. Granted, this isn't much of an issue
in Czechia, which is both well mapped (so there isn't much opportunity
to add new stuff) and well maintained (so the erroneous edits don't hold
for too long), but some of the less developed parts of the OSM world are
littered with "names" such as "school", "roundabout", "grocery store",
"forest path" and similar. IMHO we shouldn't be setting an example like
this if we can help it.
If it has to be specified what kind of tickets the machine sells and the
operator=* tag isn't enough for some reason, we could specify a public
transport network with the same network=* tag that's used with public
transport route relations. If, somehow, even that weren't enough
(although I can't think of a real world scenario like that), the vending
machine node could be made a member of a specific route or maybe
public_transport=stop_area relation.
Furthermore, the "MHD" in name=* (or description=* for that matter)
won't mean much to non-Czech speakers anyway.
--
Michal Fabík
I would completely remove the name, not move it to a the description.
There is a correct operator set, and the name or description doesn't really add anything new.
Additionally - this seems to be the typical "new user and iD" goof, where the new mapper is adding the operator, but iD implies it needs the name by putting it prominently up.
Just look at the history where it was added.
25. května 2019 9:55:07 SELČ, "Michal Fabík" <michal.fabik na gmail.com> napsal:
zobrazit citaci
> a)
>anything and everything can/should have a name, and b) names and
>descriptions
« zpět na výpis měsíce